Reino Tapaninen

Case Studies
Heinavaara
Kuokkala
Riihenmaki

AIA Amsterdam
Home

Schools of the Future: 
The Need for Open and Flexible Spaces

By Reino Tapaninen
, Chief Architect
National Board of Education, Finland

Teaching and working methods at schools are being renewed
Jouni Koiso-Kanttila, Finnish professor of architecture, has claimed that during their century-long history, school buildings in Finland have remained surprisingly similar in content until recent years. Education has been based on classroom-centered teaching; the school building has consisted of closed classrooms and connecting corridors.

However, pedagogic thinking and educational philosophy have changed. There has been a shift from teacher-centered instruction to pupil-centered learning. This has resulted in reformed curricula and teaching methods. Instead of classes of uniform length with breaks in between, schoolwork now consists of diverse cooperational situations of planning, studying and assessment. The rhythm of work is changing: the whole day is for learning, not only during classes. New things are learnt in the form of larger entities by means of various joint projects. Pupil groups vary in respect of size and age group formation. In their studies pupils may choose individual paths of proceeding according to their own needs. The enormous progress of information technology has revolutionized the methods of acquiring and producing information. It has made possible information search from networks outside school, cooperation networks between schools, and contacts with other partners and homes. Learning is no longer bound to time and place. Handcrafts have come back into favor again — the value of art education is emphasized. An investigative, experimenting, observative, and self-motivated approach to working is favored in education.

It will be easier to achieve many of the facilities required today or in the future if the current classroom-centered way of working is given up or substantially reduced.

Work is done in small groups with or without a teacher either on the school's own premises or outside, e.g., at enterprises, libraries, etc. Information is searched from books, newspapers, periodicals, IT or AV sources, information networks or by observation, and processed by IT tools. In order to make natural science observations, work is done in laboratories or on the spot in nature. Creative work is diversified in music, visual arts, and handcrafts. Work is done by traditional means as well as those means made possible by the new technology. Pupils go in for diverse physical training and sports. Work is also done in big groups: festivities, information events, stimulative lectures, panel discussions, plays, exhibitions, and performances are organized for the whole school community.

What is the school of the future like?
Will separate school facilities be needed at all in the future if it is possible to study using computers and information networks, e.g., at home or the library? Will learning spaces be connected to the rest of the built environment: offices, factories, banks and libraries, where everyday life matters and skills will be studied in an authentic environment?

A physical place will still be needed to gather, search for information, and study—a place where one can bond and belong. A place will be needed where children and youth can meet their peers, associate with each other, and take part in things together. This is of vital importance for their social growth.

What kind of spaces will be needed in the school of the future? Certainly the same kind of spaces as there are now: learning, discussion, and groupwork spaces for groups of different sizes, from auditoriums to small groupwork nooks. Workshops will be needed for handcrafts, and special spaces and laboratories for learning by experimenting and by carrying out various work tasks. Sufficient space is needed for diverse study material in connection with the workspaces. Physical training and sports require a space that also takes into account the needs of the surrounding community. It is important that there is a space or place, a square for the gathering of the whole school community. It must be possible to use the space reserved for dining flexibly as a groupwork space and maybe also as an all-day cafe. The meaning of the library as the information center of the school is significant. It will be a centrally located place for information gathering, with many terminals, multimedia workstations, and connections with foreign information networks.

Teachers' workspaces must no longer be isolated in a separate administration wing but located in the middle of the learning spaces or in their immediate vicinity. While participating in learning situations, teachers themselves also learn, experiment, and observe. Several teachers may be present in the same learning situation.

The requirement of openness, flexibility, and variability

Openness, transparency, variability, and flexibility are the prime requirements placed on school buildings of the future. Openness and transparency are part of the school's operations, instruction, and daily work, but they are also prerequisites for the physical environment of the school. Schools will no longer consist of successive classrooms and connecting corridors; instead, the central space of a school may be an open learning hall, information and resource center, library-mediatheque, events square—the place can be called many names. Anyway, by nature it is a flexible and variable space where pupils can independently search and produce information, work individually or in groups. Part of the space may be reserved for breaks and recreation. Near the learning hall are spaces of the classes connected to the learning hall even without a partition wall. There are several examples of such schools in Finland; in the U.S. this type of school is fairly common.

The spaces must enable flexible, versatile, and variable use: instead of bearing walls that hinder variability, the structural solutions should favor pillars, light partition walls, and wide spans. It must be possible to connect rooms with each other by movable wall and door elements. Also, the technical systems—installations for heating, plumbing, ventilation, electricity, and information networks—need to be flexible. Often the wiring of workstations consists of a disordered bundle of cords and sockets. Maybe soon we will see school buildings with the floor structure commonly used in office buildings: on top of the suspended slab is a separate light installation floor under which all the electric networks and cords run.

The spaces should be furnished with comfortable and pleasant furniture that enables versatile use. Traditional furniture for schools has consisted of a combination of a desk and bench. However, this concept is poorly suited for the modern way of working at school. Office-type furniture with table groups that can be combined and varied in many ways is better suited for the work environment. The desk must allow a workstation to be placed on it, it must be possible to write, draw, and do arts and crafts on it—various requirements that sometimes exclude each other are set on the furniture. The learning space may also resemble a living room, with rocking chairs, couches, and plants. The whole of the building technology—lighting, air conditioning and waste management—must create a positive example of an environment based on sustainable development.

Analogies for the configuration of school buildings can be sought in the urban space environment. The school may have a central events square or learning arena, and it may be built around an inner street or thoroughfare. The learning spaces are located along an active inner street that provides contacts and encounters, and the street may be connected to the larger pedestrian traffic network of the community.

The “intelligent” house and technical systems
Today the maintenance and upkeep of a building can be monitored and regulated very closely and in detail by means of information technology. The state of all the technical systems of buildings—heating, ventilation and electrical systems—can be monitored and controlled by computers. Repair and maintenance needs become apparent immediately. Maintenance and repair measures are recorded and updated in a digital maintenance log.

This could also be utilized in school education: the pupils could follow the functioning, energy flows, and technical systems of the building through the school's open information network. This would illustrate the internal, "hidden" functions of a complex modern building.

The school and surrounding community
A new type of learning center cannot be created without a staff, teachers as well as other employees, who are enthusiastic about and committed to the new thinking. Teachers themselves will increasingly have to define the character of the learning environment they desire. Teacher education institutes bear much responsibility for breaking the conventions of teaching practices.

The school must have a working and open connection with the surrounding world. The school should participate actively in the operations of its area of influence and community. All community members may come to the school to search for information, to work, and to pursue their hobbies. The school is a multipurpose and resource center in which the municipal library, sports facilities, theater and music rooms, and other cultural service facilities should be placed. The school could also utilize the premises of the enterprises in the neighborhood such as workshops and laboratories. Maybe the school could also rent its facilities and machinery to enterprises and for commercial purposes.

School spaces must enable equal access—the school must be open to all, the disabled, mobility-impaired and the aged. The special education spaces should not be isolated but placed immediately in conjunction with other education spaces.

The majority of the school stock in Finland has already been built, but dozens of new buildings still come into being every year. We face the challenge of implementing the idea of a versatile, open, and variable school building in existing spaces. This is an issue to be discussed in conjunction with every project of renewing an old school.

Case Studies:
Heinavaara   Kuokkala   Riihenmaki

Reino Tapaninen
Chief Architect
National Board of Education, Finland
P.O. Box 380
FIN-00531 Helsinki, Finland
Phone +358 9 77477121
Fax +358 9 77477197
E-mail: reino.tapaninen@oph.fi